Language Rights in the Digital Age: Expanding Scopes, Emerging Limits
Keywords:
Language rights, Language technology, Linguistic marginalization, Social inclusion, AI governance.Abstract
Language rights have traditionally been framed as essential to cultural identity, equality, and democratic participation. However, recent developments have significantly reshaped their scope and limitations. This paper examines emerging challenges to language rights in the contemporary era, particularly in the context of technological advancement, globalization, and shifting political dynamics. It highlights how digital platforms and artificial intelligence systems risk reinforcing linguistic hierarchies by privileging dominant languages while marginalizing low-resource and indigenous ones. At the same time, the paper explores tensions between language preservation and national integration, as well as the practical difficulties of implementing mother-tongue education policies. Additionally, it addresses growing concerns over data ownership and the use of linguistic resources by private technology actors, raising questions about cultural sovereignty in the digital age. By critically analysing these developments, the study argues that language rights must be reconceptualized beyond formal recognition to ensure meaningful inclusion, equitable access, and protection of linguistic diversity in an increasingly interconnected world.
References
1. Bird, S., & Simons, G. (2003). Language
documentation and description. International
Journal of Language Documentation and
Conservation, 1(1), 1–20.
2. Erdocia, I., Schneider, B., & Migge, B. (2025).
Language in the age of AI technology. Cambridge
University Press
3. Helm, P., Bella, G., Koch, G., & Giunchiglia, F.
(2024). Diversity and language technology: How
language modeling bias causes epistemic
injustice. Ethics and Information Technology,
26(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-
023-09742-6
4. Longpre, S., Mahari, R., Chen, A., Obeng-Marnu,
N., Sileo, D., Brannon, W., Muennighoff, N.,
Khazam, N., Kabbara, J., Perisetla, K., Wu, X. A.,
Shippole, E., Bollacker, K., Wu, T., Villa, L.,
Pentland, S., & Hooker, S. (2024). A large-scale
audit of dataset licensing and attribution in AI.
Nature Machine Intelligence, 6, 975–987.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00878-8
5. Schulz, M., & Loewen-Colón, J. (2026).
Preventing AI extractivism: The case for braiding
Indigenous data justice with ABS for stronger AI
data governance. AI & Society.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02931-z
6. Smart, A., Hutchinson, B., Amugongo, L. M.,
Dikker, S., Zito, A., Ebinama, A., Wudiri, Z.,
Wang, D., van Liemt, E., Sedoc, J., Olojo, S.,
Uwakwe, S., Wornyo, E., Schmer-Galunder, S., &
Smith-Loud, J. (2025). Socially responsible data
for large multilingual language models. arXiv.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05247
7. Sustainability Directory. (2025, June 25).
Community data sovereignty in AI-augmented
TEK applications. Sustainability Directory.